REDS DOGHOUSE

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: What historical event would you like to have been a part of?


Reds PA

Status: Offline
Posts: 5222
Date:
What historical event would you like to have been a part of?
Permalink Closed


i wud have liked to be part of the first man on the moon !!

just to see wat it feels like !confused.gif

__________________


Silver

Status: Offline
Posts: 501
Date:
Permalink Closed

its made of cheese ...

i would have liked to have watched the 1966 world cup final!

__________________


Reds PA

Status: Offline
Posts: 5222
Date:
Permalink Closed

yeah bet that wud have been great !!

how about take part in it !! D

__________________


Doghouse Proprietor

Status: Offline
Posts: 4071
Date:
Permalink Closed

id quite like to go back to the big bang

__________________



Reds PA

Status: Offline
Posts: 5222
Date:
Permalink Closed

wats the big bang ?

__________________


Doghouse Proprietor

Status: Offline
Posts: 4071
Date:
Permalink Closed

the big bang, when the whole universe was created

The Big Bang is the cosmological model of the universe that is best supported by all lines of scientific evidence and observation. The essential idea is that the universe has expanded from a primordial hot and dense initial condition at some finite time in the past and continues to expand to this day. Georges Lemaître proposed what became known as the Big Bang theory of the origin of the Universe, although he called it his 'hypothesis of the primeval atom'. The framework for the model relies on Albert Einstein's General Relativity as formulated by Alexander Friedmann. After Edwin Hubble discovered in 1929 that the distances to far away galaxies were generally proportional to their redshifts, this observation was taken to indicate that all very distant galaxies and clusters have an apparent velocity directly away from our vantage point. The farther away, the higher the apparent velocity.[1] If the distance between galaxy clusters is increasing today, everything must have been closer together in the past. This idea has been considered in detail back in time to extreme densities and temperatures, and large particle accelerators have been built to experiment on and test such conditions, resulting in significant confirmation of the theory. But these accelerators can only probe so far into such high energy regimes. Without any evidence associated with the earliest instant of the expansion, the Big Bang theory cannot and does not provide any explanation for such an initial condition, rather explaining the general evolution of the universe since that instant. The observed abundances of the light elements throughout the cosmos closely match the calculated predictions for the formation of these elements from nuclear processes in the rapidly expanding and cooling first minutes of the universe, as logically and quantitatively detailed according to Big Bang nucleosynthesis.

Fred Hoyle is credited with coining the phrase 'Big Bang' during a 1949 radio broadcast, as a derisive reference to a theory he did not subscribe to.[2] Hoyle later helped considerably in the effort to figure out the nuclear pathway for building certain heavier elements from lighter ones. After the discovery of the cosmic microwave background radiation in 1964, and especially when its collective frequencies sketched out a blackbody curve, most scientists were fairly convinced by the evidence that some Big Bang scenario must have occurred.

__________________



Reds PA

Status: Offline
Posts: 5222
Date:
Permalink Closed

sounds interesting redders !

__________________


Silver

Status: Offline
Posts: 501
Date:
Permalink Closed

sitting on the grassy knoll to see what really happened

__________________


Reds PA

Status: Offline
Posts: 5222
Date:
Permalink Closed

ill sit with ya P

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard